﻿<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Inland Empire .NET User's Group Forums / .NET Development - New and Upcoming Features / LINQ  / Interesting Article: Is LINQ to SQL Truly Dead? / Latest Posts</title><generator>InstantForum.NET v4.1.3</generator><description>Inland Empire .NET User's Group Forums</description><link>http://forums.iedotnetug.org/forums/</link><webMaster>forums@iedotnetug.org</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 23:31:32 GMT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title>Interesting Article: Is LINQ to SQL Truly Dead?</title><link>http://forums.iedotnetug.org/forums/Topic211-17-1.aspx</link><description>Looks like MS is pulling further development on LINQ to SQL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/11/DLINQ-Future"&gt;http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/11/DLINQ-Future&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I'm not really a LINQ user, when I did play with it LINQ to SQL was my playground.  I'm still not familiar enough with the DE Framework to make a lot of good use of it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any comments?</description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:35:08 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>MattPenner</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>
